HD dvd claims lead in player sales

[steverhcp02]

prlatino86 said:

ChronotriggerJM said:

The only thing that bothers me about the whole thing is that HD-DVD is an inferior product :/ that cost's more to invest in >< The player is the only thing cheaper, the disks are over-run with combo dvd's which cost more, and the specs of the two disks themselves heavily favor Bluray. /sigh

Specs dont totally really mean anything if you take side by side comparisons and cant tell a difference. And how is HD DVD cost more to invest in?

 Also for seamless branchikng which lets you view multiple versions of the film on one disc....instead of putting 3 versions.....regular, extended and director you have one regular with seperate traintracks for each of the other versions...so you can select which way you want the train track to go before you select play.....when the info is transfered without a higher bitrate capacity you will experience a "hitch" in the film because of th ebottleneck.....because of BD's size and bitrate, we can see multiple versions on one disc without experienceing any loss in viewing quality......

I see youve taken the PQ line hook line and sinker form the HD DVD campaign, yes the codecs show us a slight difference if any on certain films, but its the entire package that must be viewed...