| Sky Render said: Of course, the practical ramifications have to be considered, as well: Nintendo would not have presented anything as half-finished as Natal on the show floor; they would've given it a Vitality Sensor-esque showing with no demonstration if they were going to reveal it at a stage when it's so clearly not show-worthy (by their standards, at least). And then too, I can't see Nintendo developing a product like Natal. It shoots well past "good enough" and enters into the Uncanny Valley of motion controls, where you're not quite at 1:1 virtual reality controls, but past 1:1 object-centric controls. But yes, there would be the usual anti-Nintendo sentiment. Mostly because MS pays good money to make sure that Nintendo doesn't get a good rap, and because the gamers they've won over from the Nintendo camp are about as friendly towards Nintendo as ex-Catholics are to Catholicism. |
Now that is 100% Malstrom material. Nintendo will never get anything good out of the current gaming press.Maybe it will come from a "new press".
Satan said:
"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."







