It is a decent rebuttal. I like this:
"Who would be foolish enough to assume that Nintendo is easily beat? The same type of fool which assumes them to be unbeatable."
But then you followed up with this:
"A fool who lucks out is not a fool you should listen to even if they are right once."
Your first statement has some truth to it. I think it a little more foolish to say that Nintendo can be easily beat this gen than they are unbeatable this gen, but next gen, the odds even somewhat. But I do not have to listen to an argument without basis because it might be "lucky." (I don't think you argument is without basis. While I don't completely agree, I will listen because you are not a fool.)
My favorite part was this:
"Sony and Nintendo can no longer be said to be aiming for different segments of the market. With such similar technologies they will be aiming for similar consumers. "
as for Microsoft:
"Microsoft had better be prepared for a fight. They are taking their fight into the very heart of Nintendo's stronghold, they are challenging the very existence of the Wiimote itself."
So, with the advent of these new technologies all three companies are finally in direct competition with each other?
Very well, I can wait.
"You can never jump away from Conclusions. Getting back is not so easy. That's why we're so terribly crowded here."
Canby - The Phantom Tollbooth
