ameratsu said:
First off, there was no compelling reason to call this fake. As Torillian pointed out, there've been some fake reviews floating around and I suppose that's what put you guys on edge. That probably made it difficult to see that this was a real review, but the reasons you provided for this being fake are insubstantial by themselves. Second, why don't you like what was written? Have you played the single player campaign? The multiplayer? The time to disagree with a review, assuming that it doesn't have glaring factual errors, is after you've played it. Saying you'll still buy the game is fine, saying you disagree with a review for a game that you haven't played makes no sense. |
A few mistakes in a review are enough to catch people's eye. Maybe the reasons i stated for thinking it was a fake weren't so big, fair enough, but the fact that there have already been a few fake reviews and the very obvious errors made me doubt its legitimacy. Especially since i cannot remember the last time i remember such obvious errors in a review from ONM.
Oh, and i don't like what was written, i guess mostly because after reading it all i feel they didn't spend enough time on the pro's and the cons didn't feel so large to me (comparisons to Perfect Dark etc.), not large enough for the score to be put down so low. I didn't say the review was bad, i didn't say the reviewer was totally wrong. Also, yes i think it is possible to disagree with a review for a game you've never played if you know enough about it.
I feel you were a bit mislead by my posts, which is down to how i wrote them so i apologize for that. But i think you've gotten the complete wrong idea about me and what i was trying to say.
How technical is your game?
