By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FKNetwork on 04 June 2009
Edit Thread
bardicverse said:
FKNetwork said:

I still laugh at that muck up now lol, it shows natal isn't yet perfect but make no mistake, it will be and when it is the wii had better start hiding as this tech will take the world by storm, you know it, they know it, everyone knows it hence why sooo many big names are involved with it and developer kits are already being sent out for it, microsoft will do everything to make this a success,

Wii was the starting step in motion control, sony and microsoft will now easily pass it with much better controls as you've seen at E3, lucky Wii has that huge lead as it won't be keeping it at this rate,

You have to remember that the only thing Wii is good for is the motion controls, the actual system is very very basic and nothing more than a smaller gamecube, same poor graphics and sound, basic network features etc, without the advantage in motion control Nintendo have nothing and this is why Nintendo is getting ripped apart by the media since E3, they needed something to keep them ahead, they didn't deliver simple as that, a few new mario games and a pacemaker isn't going to keep them ahead lol......

There were a lot of big names supporting the PS3 at launch too, it didn't help a lot.

You also forget that Nintendo is working with Ubisoft on a camera that will launch this year. A bit of tweaking and the Wii will have its own system to compete with Natal tech, but before Natal.

The 360 has carved its part for the core market, the Wii is the system for the casual market and long-term Nintendo fans. There will be nothing this generation that will bring the casual market away from the Wii, plain and simple.

When the people behind Natal show me how they are going to run around in an FPS level, I'll give them credit. Until then, this is a goofy experiment that will cost MS more than they will make from.

Since the Wii is starting to break its stride, the graphics are getting much better, some comparing closely to early 360 games.

What it sounds like, is that your fanboy bias is so extreme that you are holding onto natal as your last hope to take some steam away from Nintendo. I hate to tell you, but it's not going to work out that way.

The industry has already decided what the 3 systems excel best at -

360 = online gaming, core gaming

PS3 = strong graphics, advanced physics, Blu Ray technology

Wii = motion controls, casual gaming, family-friendly gaming

Granted, there are markets for the HD systems to have some casual gaming, but its a smaller amount than their core gaming. There also is a market for Wii core gaming, but its a smaller market than the casual market on the Wii.

This is pretty much set in stone, this generation is decided by the people that make it happen - the publishers and developers. Washed up people like Spielberg can't even change that now.

Wow! from your little defensive deluded post it seems that your the fanboy, you made it clear for all to see!

I own all three consoles, I don't really care what sells what or what does what, all i'm after is the most enjoyment which the 360 provides by the masses, it's not a console which only becomes fun when you have freinds around or once you had a few drinks (hint), I'm just stating my view which I will stick by as your reply did nothing more than make you look very very silly specially when you resort to slagging people like spielberg off, very childish.......