| Bladeforce said: I find the great thing about posting this thread is how people's comments fall into the Sony / Microsoft mould without even knowing the true extent of the disruption business model |
I agree. I love reading about these topics for that reason. I think part of the problem is that the ones that fit the mould only read the responces to Maelstrom where as those interested in Maerstrom tend to be more interested in Christenson work. So they often miss the real point and just itterate Christenson mould. It's a hoot.
mrstickball said:
For such an uncompleted project, I don't see the Wiimote as being entirely disruptive.
See this is a perfect example of the lack of understanding of the application of the Blue Ocean Strategy. mrstickball has taken a soley product view of the industry. Where as BOS isn't about the product. It's about accessing a new market, accibility of the market and first to market. It's about a different market game rather than the same market game. The old market game was about the product. Since mrstickball is placing disruption as the product not the values of a new market. He misses the impact and effect. Even Nintendo stated that their disruption and Blue Ocean Strategy isn't the Wiiremote, but only part of it. Nintendo was claiming a good year before release there approach. No one listened. Well almost no one.
That's what makes these really funny topics. I'm glad the OP started it, but at the same time it's getting old.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
