|
Smashchu2 said: ... *Why? Simple/ If Sony and Microsoft were to release new consoles, they would need new software. Neither has strong software teams (compaired to most developers) and very few hits in their repertoire (the big sellers have all been third party games). They need third parties to make them. If the Wii is still out and selling, then third parties might not put their games on the new system and just stick with Nintendo. Gamers may also stay with Nintendo as they have all the content they want, and there is so much more on it then on the new systems. The new systems will only sell to those users who see a prospect of a new game. If no content is on there to "hype" them up, they still wont buy it. They won't be able to out compete Nintendo or each other, and they will fail. ...
|
Frankly I don't care about the remarks about my grammar, I'm always ready to learn. I'm more worried about the fact that you seem not willing to conduct this conversation in an ordered manner without changing subject all the time or ignoring the points that have been previously made.
I started writing a point by point reply, but then I realized how useless it was. A debate is only useful if both parties take the time to read and try to understand what the other is saying, and either disprove it or take account of it in following through. You have demonstrated multiple times that this isn't the case here.
Add to that the way you keep contradicting yourself and ignoring factual reality (neither MS nor Sony "has strong software teams"? "Very few hits in their repertoire"? ), and the way you prefer to live in your imaginary world (Nintendo "moving in for a kill", "Gamers may also stay with Nintendo as they have all the content they want") and this exchange really is devoid of value.
