| Keep_the_change said:
First place: goes obviously to wii motion plus since it is here already, revamping an experience Wii owners have since '06 when Sony and Microsoft weren't interested in fad gimmicks. It acts with 1:1 flawlessly accuracy.
Second place: Sony's purple wand. It acts with 1:1 flawlessly accuracy just like the WM+ but it requires a camera. Also, second hand attachment seems not to be available.
Third Place: Not in the same field as Sony and Nintendo Motion Control. Feels like a revamped Eye Toy, adds nothing really new in the gaming market. Project Milo was confirmed by IGN that the trailer shown was pure bullshit, unresponsive character that was just able to recognize a shirt color with the help of a developer controlling the game. For further enjoyment just look at my sig.
WELL BAM! There it is :D |
Sony's tech is actually far more advanced then Nintendo's.
Think of this. The Wii Remote can only track arm motions. Even with the balance board you would have limited body motion.
In a game like red steal 2 you have to use the nunchuck joystick to move. Imagine a sword game when while you do have a joystick to do m assive large scale movement. If your bring charged you just take a step to the left, stick the wand aka sword in game out, and the moronic AI charging you rams his head into the sword blade while you side stepped in real life while moving the controller into position for where the sword ingame would be to accomplish the scene I just made up.
So really the real loser in this race is Nintendo. They only track the arms while Sony tracks everything and Microsoft tracks body movement but just not specific point tracking. I don't believe Microsoft's tech would be good at quick and accurate motions of the arm like Sony's wand and the Wii Motion + but should be able to track it well enough to put them ahead of Nintendo.
