Sqrl said:
@bolded, Since you are going by his view - You are saying you don't see a difference between killing babies (what he views this man did for a living) and killing terrorist or enemy soldiers (what soldiers do) on a field of battle. So no..his logic doesn't lead to that conclusion. Your statement is simply a massive simplification of an issue that is not simple.
|
No it's not an oversimplification in any way what so ever. I think you will find that the vast majority of wars are fought between multiple The soldiers kill other soldiers who are also doing it for their job.
In any war you are killing people who fight as part of their job. Enemy soldiers are just as innocent as your soldiers are in reality. A solidier who kills another soldier knows nothing about them, that soldier could be a saint in real life, it's disconnected murder like abortion. So by his logic a soldier is a sick twisted indiviual who murders for pleasure the same as abortionists.
It's hypocritical, how can one justify the army murdering people they know nothing about, but claim that abortion is immoral because it is murder?
(Note: I support both the army and abortion)







