As a guaranteed future Wii owner (I'm still holding out), I honestly don't see myself getting either of the other systems anytime in the near future.
The 360 doesn't have any big games that are must have for me (I don't really care for FPSes) and I refuse to pick one up until they get the smaller, cooler chips into case. While it's nice that MS is offering a 3 year warranty, I really don't want a system that requires it. And the $50 price cut after a year and a half on the market was lame. Let me know when you really drop the price, MS. So why consider a 360 at all? There are some Live Arcade games that I'd really like. So unless someone ports them over to the PC or Wii, I'll continue to want the system for them.
And the PS3... where do I start? I don't have an HDTV and don't care to pay extra money for Blu-ray discs. And like the 360, there aren't any games that I'm really interested in besides a few PSN exclusive titles. But instead of improving the value of the system this year, Sony has gone and actually made it worse! It took them a whole year to drop the price by $100, but the only way they could do it was by completely removing backwards compatibility and some other minor features. With a PS2 costing around $100, that's a sad trade off. In fact, I'll just stick with my PS2 again this year since the games are cheaper and more engaging than anything on the PS3.
So in the end, I'd say none of the above. But if you must have one, you'd probably be better off with the 360.
Numbers are like people. Torture them enough and you can get them to say anything you want.
VGChartz Resident Thread Killer
