Onimusha12 said:
No, No, that's quite wrong. Not every company is desperate, Nintendo for example is anything but desperate at this point. Sony is the only one of the big three showing any real desperation, selling off assets, stripping down features in the PS3 and abandoning the ideals of super high graphic gaming for lower graphic longer gameplay titles. And spin it however you like but Sony didn't make multiple SKUs to give you choices, they did it to try and rectify the problem of their product not selling. |
But you do have more choices now, don't you? All the companies are the same, they want your money. It's called business!
Microsoft also released multiple SKU and now all the SKU have HDMI. That's not desperation? That's not rectifying the problem of their product? Be subjective, please!
How did you know the only purpose that Sony IPO their insurance business is to save PS3? What is your source? Yes, Sony made some stupid judgement in multiple arms of their core business before (first LCD TV, then MP3 player, now PS3), but they are trying to catch up. They are doing very well with their LCD TV, aren't they? Whether they will do it again on their Playstation business, we will see. I do see PSP doing pretty well lately.
Back to the topic, I don't see anything wrong with their multiple SKU strategy. Do you hear people complaining when they buy a computer or a car for too many choices. If you want something more, pay for it. Here I quote:
BC is a luxury, not a necessity...



It (PS3's market share) might hit 30%, but definently not more. ~ Neo
Flaming (Calling another user (any user) a fanboy is flaming.) ~ Machina-AX







