dsister44 said:
damndl0ser said:
dsister44 said: i hope it doesn't have anything to do with the book. master chief did very little in the fight for reach |
I don't think it has to have the Master Chief in it in order for the game to be good. I just hope they spend the time and put a lot of polish into the final product. As long as the game is good and has a decent enough story people will buy it on par with halo 3.
|
but they need to keep master chief in the game. :(
i am fine with them making spin off of it. without him, but if they make halo 4 without mc then i will drop the series
|
Considering the extra bit of the ending if you beat Halo 3 on Legendary, of course the Chief will the be star of the next main game.
But a Reach-based prequel where you play as Kelly and the gang would rock!
Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?
Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off. I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."