This thread reminds me of a discussion I had years ago with someone that used to read the National Enquirer. One day they read out some predictions from a psychic and I said it was all nonsense. They then pointed out a major prediction the psychic had made before that happened. I then pointed out that the psychic made predictions each year and one of them coming true was not any kind of proof of them having special insight. I could tell that dispite the conversation the person still had their belief in the psychic's abilities and that I was just wasting my time.
I should have known that when I mentioned how Malstrom's analysis and prediction about the Presidential Election was wrong that someone would dismiss it or make some kind of excuse to ignore it. I know if I point out any mistakes that Malstrom makes (like making up quotes, getting facts wrong, etc) that people will just say to ignore those as well. So I'm saying from experience to anyone that tries to argue over his writings, don't bother because you'll eventually come to realize that you're just wasting your time and to just ignore threads about him from now on.
