So when will Vgchartz's reviews be on metacritic?

[MontanaHatchet]

theprof00 said:

MaxwellGT2000 said:

nordlead said:

loadedstatement said:

theprof00 said:
gamerankings also requires professionalism, therefore we need to change our name to vgcharts if we wanna be on there.

No thanks.  Im sure Google and Yahoo sounded funny at the time too.  Tons of companies have weird names.  That's what makes you remember them.  A 'z' doesn't decide whether we are professional or not. :)

actually the z doesn't even matter to gamerankings, as they allow all sorts of crazy named website (Da Gameboyz for example). It was just theprof00's lame attempt to complain about nothing but make it look legit.

oh so like normal? :P

Yeah I hope we get on the rankings, not because I really support meta or gamerankings cause I think saying ____ game is better because of either is kinda lame and against what reviews are there for in the first place, but I want us on there so more people will see our awesome reviews ^_^

round of applause for the 3 guys who took a joke seriously.

I expected it to pwn someone like maxwell, but 2 mods?!?

If you guys can't tell a joke, then maybe I should be bribing nordlead every month.

 

It's a joke because people actually do complain about the z affecting professionalism. That's funny to me. It's also a requirement that a site maintain professionalis and while vgc is probably one of the most professional sites I've ever been to, these detractors present a seeming paradox. I guess you just took me seriously is all. In that regard, Ill give loaded statement a free pass since he doesn't know me, and I'll give maxwell a free pass because well, ever since the accident, he just.... you know. But nordlead, if it wasn't for the fact that you are a staunch hardline conservative I would have already lost faith in you.

 

Oh my god, would you stop? Your joke wasn't funny and none of us really care what you think about us. All of the complaints so far in this thread about the review system have been ridiculous at best. People always complain that Metacritic just allows any old site to be on there, but then Vgchartz isn't good enough to be on Metacritic despite a great staff and a steady output of reviews?