Is this quote racist and/or sexist?

[Tyrannical]

akuma587 said:

Tyrannical said:

akuma587 said:
A lot of Supreme Court law is 100% court made. Its common law. Congress cannot change many of the Supreme Court's ruling on a wide variety (but not all) of issues or else they will violate separation of powers. We live under a common law judicial system. Unless a statute is involved (and the majority of the Supreme Court's cases do not involve statute), it doesn't matter what Congress has to say. You can't defer to Congress when Congress doesn't have the subject matter jurisdiction to speak on the issue.

Congress can over rule any Federal court decision based on State Law, the State Constitution, or Federal law. I'm pretty sure all applicable common law has been codified at the federal level. I'm not so sure on the state level, but I'd be surprised if it hasn't been codified as well.

No, you are wrong.  And I don't even know what you mean by "the State Constitution."  Congress cannot contradict what the Supreme Court says the Constitution requires (although they can provide additional protections to people, they just can't go in the opposite direction, such as doing what the Constitution forbids).  Its a separation of powers issue.  The Supreme Court is the final interpreter of what the Constitution means, period.  That includes the vast majority of constitutional jurisprudence.  Think of "constitutional common law" as constitutional jurisprudence. This is why I know someone knows nothing about constitutional law when they say it is the Supreme Court's job to "interpret" the law.  They make law when it comes to the Constitution.  Plain and simple.  That's how it has been for the last 200 years.

On an unrelated note, there is a little bit of federal common law, but that is a different issue entirely.

What do they teach you in law school? Congress can pass a new federal law which has supremacy over state law, state constitution, or a previous federal law. Congress has many times passed a new law because they did not like a federal court's interpretation of it. "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives", a fact many activist judges seem to over look.