By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nordlead said:
coolestguyever said:
The reviews are too biased. They are each written by one person who has very different opinions from the next guy.

The only way I could see it working is if all the reviewers voted on the rating for the game so it averages out.

and so how many websites use multiple writers for each review? Nintendo has 3 writers but they don't work together. It clearly says who reviewed it, and some claim IGN is the best review site out there. Boom Blox Bash Party was written by Matt Casamassina, while Punch-Out!! was written by Craig Harris. You'd find the same true for PS3 and X360 reviews.

Also, for all you know it is only 1 person, but there is an approval process that involves multiple people and the score must get through that.

your argument is weak and lame.

I don't see the point in an approval process as such, but just for the other reviewers to take a look and see any obvious anomaly, really no on should care if a game recieved 0.2 lower score because a certain reviewer gave it that.

I put the emphasis on "should" there because it never seems to work out... hell stupid metacritic wouldn't exists if there weren't so many people who actually care about 0.2 differences in a games score.