I'd just like to point out that if you accept his two "facts" as postulates, the logic still makes little sense as people do not suddenly want to buy the next thing really bad from someone who made something terrible last time. That's like saying, "Gee, Baker Bob's muffins were really terrible yesterday. I want to get me some more of his muffins to get the terrible taste out." What's much more likely to happen is, "Gee, Baker Bob's muffins were really terrible yesterday. I want to get me some of Baker Bill's muffins to get the terrible taste out."
If something is teh suxorz, people generally don't stick around and wait for more because, more likely than not, it will be more of teh suxorz.








