By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Alterego-X said:
ash3336 said:
I hope its Fallout 4.

Or Elder Scrolls V

Now that I read this post, it seems both ridiculous and pathetic that even when a team clearly says "big title", almost no one even dares to think of anything but ports, and spin-offs, because there are no big titles on the Wii, period.

Well in this case I can understand Bethesda making a "spin-off" not because it's on the Wii. I've never harped on Bethesda being bad programmers in regards to features when it comes to console work. I harp on Capcom because they have done a better job on older consoles. Bethesda is a PC developer first. If they see a machine that can be PC like then they will work on it. The HDD pretty much passes the consoles off as PC like. The Wii even though it's SDHC compatible with the patch still sorta isn't. The company also has a phisophy of MORE. More objects with more polygon per object, with more texture per object, just plain MORE features. While I like the While the Wii isn't built on the philisophy. Wii is built with the philosphy that the powe is good enough. It's all about how you play the games. The Wii could handle the features, but I doubt that Bethesda woulddowngrade the graphics. Bethesda could do it though. Take a look at Daggerfall. They have done spawling RPG games on lower spec. Something like Redgaurd isn't so much a spin-off as much it's more telling a different story from there vast bland world.

Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.