By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WereKitten said:
nightsurge said:

If by crossing the hilltop of profitiability you mean still losing $50 per machine then you're right.

Also, Sony is still predicting another 1 Billion loss for next year, so losses involved with currency, the PS brand, and other areas of their business are still very much a big issue.

Oh and isn't Sony cutting their suppliers in half?  Won't that cause a lot of strain on the others and possibly have quite a negative affect?

And Kingdom Hearts 3 won't matter.  It is one game.  One game doesn't change the game just like 100 games haven't changed the situation this generation.

Losing about $40 per console on the $399 models, and thus profiting a few tens dollars per console on the $499 models. Overall they are crossing into profitability, considering that launch PS3 did lose them more than $200 each. The software and accessories bring it all definitely in the black.

And again, how would cutting the PS3 life short help them financially? What has been spent in R&D in the past is not going to come back. They would be only losing revenue at this point.

Now if you said that they might want to not take as bold a step with the PS4, that might make more sense. But it's the lifespan of the PS3 we're talking of, and it's in the interest of Sony and its investors if it's as long as possible.


     There haven't been a hundred other games that haven't mattered.  And as has been seen in Japan earlier this year games that are only Yakuza and White Knight Chronicles size can put the PS3 over the Wii for eleven weeks straight.  Those games aren't a tenth of what the Final Fantasies, GT5, and Kingdom Hearts can do for sales.