By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
trestres said:
And where did you hear the contrary? I'm not making this up. Just browse on the web and you will find it. Retro handled both MP and MP2 ports, I doubt they were the ones handling the other projects. Plus there's been some things going on with Retro for example, some top members left because of rumoured troubles with Nintendo. It's logical, first they are used to handle ports, and now with the IGN rumour that said that the Zelda game they were working on was taken away from them, I doubt they are happy. But that's completely another subject.

Of course ports take up less time, but they do take time. And taking time away from talented devs to make ports is ridiculous. Where are the games from these teams? They have been busy making the ports and it's not a coincidence none of them has announced anything but the ports.

I had heard it in some report. Whatever.

And you're still assuming the ports got in the way, when there are no reports of that. You just assumed that was part of the motives those people left. That's not logical. That's just you trying to find something to blame on this.

Ports have been around since home consoles and arcades. Acting as though the Wii should be exempt just makes you look ignorant of all of gaming history.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs