Euphoria14 said:
ironman said:
thats an unfair, untrue, incredibly biased, ignorant, trollish reply. Everybody I know who owns 360 is an adult. The one guy I know who bought a PS3 after his Xbox RRODed (he bought a refurb) is now looking to sell it and buy a 360 again because it actually has games he likes, and it has a HDMI output. He has no Bluray discs, and as far as I know, does not intend to get any. The PS3 could cut the blueray player and lower it's price $150, cut the wireless (anybody who plays using wireless is an idiot, they will lag like mad) for another $50.00 and work on getting some better games. Then work on advertising. I personally have nothing against the PS3, it just wasn't the best value for me and didn't have Halo. Sony obviously made some mistakes and is paying for it. Microsoft can cut prices just to squeeze Sony out of the picture, they sold the Xbox at a considerable loss last gen just to get people to buy it, and look what rewards they are reaping now? For only having a second console, and much animosity against Americans and Microsoft in other countries, I would say they are doing considerably well. |
Hey Grammar Man, if Sony cut out the Bluray player how would it play PS3 games?
Also what makes you think cutting out the wireless would shave off $50? Wireless doesn't cost anywhere near what MS charges for the adapter.
It will probably shave like $20 at most.
|
Grammer Man? I dig that, I think I shall change my name! If Sony cut out the blu ray player, they could sell their games on DVDs...this would lower the cost of the games (although that would be neglagable). Oh, and yes I know that the wireless componants cost them about $23.00, but if they nixed the wireless, their loss on the $50.00 cut would be lessoned. But hey, what do I know? I'm just *DUN DUN DUN DUN!!!!* Grammer Man!!!!
