txrattlesnake said:
Smashchu2 said:
@HanzoTheRazor: Stop being stupid. Your the biggest fanboy here. You came into the thread and back to bck said how it's stupid and that Sony is No. 1. Really, would someone who wasn't drinking the Sony juice say this: "Most know in their hearts that this E3 and 2009 is going to be massive for SONY, (they can smell it) and more than likely quiet for MS."
Here is what is upsetting: this entire thread has become a fanboy idiocy conference. It seems I can post a topic without the Sony Defense Force to come in and act like a huge ass. I was hoping the arguments would have look both ways and that criticism was well thought out and directed at fallacies in my argument. Some replies were good, but almost all of them were incredibly biased and piss poor at best. A lot of you even messed up numbers that are here on this site.
I made the first comment for a reason. The idea was to get people to understand: hey, I know I'm bashing Sony, but let's keep this civil and intellectual, but all of you failed to do so. Wanna know why there are so many doom and gloom threads? Because the evidence points that way. However, none of you have thought to try and challenge those beliefs. Instead, you give rhetoric about the greatness of the PS3. About how FF13 will come save it like MGS4 would have and KZ2. The idea was to right a well thought out post challenging the belief of the "The PS3 will last a long time." As such, your arguments come out terrible and the "doom and gloom" guys continue to be have the upper hand. Why don't some of you try to challenge the belief that the PS3 is doomed? Why don't you do some analysis and try to challenge the idea?
I could sit here all day and try to argue this, but it is clear all of you will just stick to your belief and rather then to try and act intelligent, will just call me stupid. Now, some did try to make analysis, but many of you assumed the truth and called me an idiot because I don't know the truth.
As it stands, no one has brought a good argument, even though some of you did try and stay civil, and I thank you for that. |
Seems to me you're always calling the kettle black. As soon as Sony fans start saying why the PS3 will last longer you immediately jump on them and try to start lambasting them for making "crazy claims". Truth is nobody knows how this gen will turn out until it's over.
|
My problem, and why the claims are crazy, is they are not backed by an evidence, just retoric. Most of the constructs people made have no number backing. They they do, the numbers will either point the opposite of what they are saying or are completly wrong. This is why I tried to quiz people. Why would it do that?
Otherwise, I will disagree with you in that know one know how this cycle will end (well, not literally. I can't read the future). I think I have a good idea about how this cycle will end, but so far, no one has brought an argument that would make me think "maybe I'm wrong," save for the economics thing. I was hoping there would be though......
ON FF on the 360: It was a smart move by Square. The 360 does a lot better in the US than the PS3. In order to try and make development cost back (as it's been there for a few years), they make it for the 360. The PS3 version may very well do better worldwide, but the plan is better for Square overall, and that is all that matter. 3rd parties will always look out for number 1.
