By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
highwaystar101 on 23 May 2009
Edit Thread
CHYUII said:
highwaystar101 said:

 

 


Todays findings is the monkey, right, I haven't looked it up yet but I want to ask you are the fossils actually confirmed by the scientific community as a whole? OR did the press pick up the story because of the exciting hypothesis and then by faith people took it as fact shortly after? There have been tons of blunders through out the centuries.

LOL, Macro- evolution may have been invented by Creationist BUT it is just a word that says, "I reject a part of what you propose and accept part of it too." Think of it as a Line Item veto. It just says, "That the data shows this but it does not show that." If I accept GOOD science and reject BAD science (Being "harder to prove") does that mean that I hate science? I think it is unreasonable to say that they are one in the same especially when scientist do use it and athiest scientist who challenge Creationist and ID's also use the term.

as I was just informed above the Theory of Evolution has many parts so how absurd would it be to say that you have to take all of it or none of it at all?

The idea that you can't separate Micro from Macro is just absurd and irrational. It is just language trick. Whether you want them seperated or not it is not up to you language is bigger than you.

 

Let us stop the madness- what is this proof that you state. Give me 7 examples of your PROOF of MACRO.

Huh, science makes blunders? It seems to me that science looks for the truth and when it finds something worng they come clean and carry on the search. Not blunders, the search for the truth. Whan was the last time religious people admitted the mistakes they have made and carried on the search for truth? I know Christians who still think the earth is 6000 years old despite all that pesky evidence showing it is FAR older and that a flood wiped out everything except 8 people, which would have killed every plant on earth so the herbivore animals could not survive.

Here is you seven examples of what you would call macro-evolution... read this, 26 examples including... http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html

Evidence of reptiles evolving into mammals

Evidence of human evolution from primates

Evidence that whales are evolved from land mammals

Vestigial tails, a left over gene from an older species

Snakes showing reptilian legs during early development... another leftover from an earlier species

The full evolution of paramecium (ehich co-incidently destroys slimebeasts bacteria arguements)

A whole heap of fossil records showing full evolution

 

Heck I can think of dozens of examples not on that site.

 

Now, Can you proove to me that god exists with seven examples.. Not just any god I mean your god specifically...