Is 360 The Standard Bearer This Gen.

[leo-j]

reask said:

MontanaHatchet said:

reask said:

MontanaHatchet said:
So basically, you thought Call of Duty 2 was a really good game, even better than a bunch of PS3 titles you've never played? You also completely ignored the Wii. Nothing released on the 360 yet compares to Super Mario Galaxy.

 

This game came out in 05 montana, it was a launch game I beleive.

Hundreds of games are way better than this game now.

But if you played it then it would have blown you away is my point.

I mean the Xbox was always playing catch up to PS2.

I just reckon we have a role reversal now.

Think about it, Xbox was supposed to be better than PS2, PS3 supposed to be superior to 360.

Yet games look no better or worse on either one.

So that was the essence of my thoughts.

Define catchup, really. Game quality? The console with the lowest userbase is not going to have the best games.

Kowenicki: And they're all PC games too.

 

 

Ok then I will site one example Fallout 3.

No trophies inferior graphics.

Now thats a recent game.

So trophies to counter acheievements.

BR to be the new dvd format.

PSN to counter live.

that is my point.

 

 

Fallout 3 has trophies