theRepublic said:
Undying said:
saicho said:
Undying said:
fkusumot said:
Undying said:
They rarly give anything below 5 points...or thumbs up and bombs of whatever retarded rating system they switched to.
|
You are so full of it.
Average Review Scores
76.84% GamePro
75.61% Gaming Age
75.40% GameZone
72.76% Game Informer
72.25% Worth Playing
71.23% Cheat Code Central
70.01% 1UP
69.69% GameSpy
68.47% IGN
67.94% Nintendo Power
67.77% EGM
67.25% GameSpot
65.43% Eurogamer
|
Now what does that say about the Wii and DS library?
|
If an offical magazine review scores for its games seem high, it's called bias and purposely boost of review scores for that certain console.
If an offical magazine review scores for its games seem low, it's a proof of games on that certain console suck.
One of these two conditions would apply if you also post the average review scores for Offical Playstation Magazine and Official XBox 360 Magazine.
Hence, this says nothing about the Wii and DS library.
|
Average Review Scores
100.00% Nintendo Power
76.84% GamePro
75.61% Gaming Age
75.40% GameZone
72.76% Game Informer
72.25% Worth Playing
71.23% Cheat Code Central
70.01% 1UP
69.69% GameSpy
68.47% IGN
67.77% EGM
67.25% GameSpot
65.43% Eurogamer
Its easy to make up facts when you don't post sources.
|
The source is gamerankings.com.
|
I can tell you one thing, i used to subscribe to NP, and their reviews were always a joke. Unless there were no bad games from 2000-2005.
