Makepeacefox said:
I noticed 2 things which confused me in your post: 1) You mention crime being low where there's lots of work but I'm sure that's the case in countries with welfare as well, and in areas with poor employment there IS crime - illegal border crossing! 2) Countries with no welfare = good, countries with welfare = bad, but Mexicans will risk their life to travel OUT of the country with no welfare?!
Further to the second point - why would anyone want to put unemployed people in such a harsh situation that the only way out of their problems is to risk their life, commit crime, and be sundered from their family?
|
1. One of the major arguments from welfare, is the wealthy get the benefit of less crime. As long as there are employment opportunities, I don't think it's true. If given the chance, more people will work for food before they will steal for it. If they would rather steal for it, then they will do that with or without welfare.
2. Work ethic of poor people in countries with no welfare = good, work ethic of poor people in countries with welfare = bad. People have to leave Mexico because of everything else that's wrong with the country. I am for a country that provides jobs for everyone that wants to work.