| leo-j said: Believe it or not, european ps3 owners didnt care about backwards compatibility. Accprding to SCEE. They had a poll and thousands voted. They said the best thing to take out for a cheaper ps3 was the memory card slots, then the BC. Still plays ps1 games, but who cares they suck any way. I f it suceeds(by suceeding sales must stay at 80k + weekly in OTHERS alone) Then it may be released in north america, and may increase sales by alot. A $399.99 PS3 will woop the $hit out of any 360 model. Sony's competition shouldnt be micro$oift alone. It should be nintendo. |
First off proof Second Ps1 games do NOT SUCK, i know you were quite young when they came out, but they were kick ass at the time, and even today i play plenty of ps1 games (mostly rpgs) Third Who cares what current PS3 owners want, we need to know what they need to remove to DRAW new people in. Fourth: Yea and while that ps3 whips the shit out of Microsoft, MS will just watch and twiddle their thumbs right?
With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B
Proud supporter of all 3 console companys
Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp
Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.
Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.






