Infamous 7/10 from Eurogamer (UK)

[forevercloud3000]

seece said:

forevercloud3000 said:

Leonidus said:

seece said:

forevercloud3000 said:

seece said:
LOL at people saying "ooo harsh", you havn't even played the game yet how would you KNOW they're being harsh, and don't tell me "Oh but I have played the demo!!" sod the poxy demo you havn't played the full game so stop with the stupid insults towards Eurogamer.

 

Well I did/ and still am playing the Demo, and come 26th of May, I will be playing the real game. When I Play the real game, and I formulate my absolute opinion on it, I assure you it will be nowhere near what Eurogamer put it. Thats just it. Eurogamer's reviews are not what people in general think of the game when they play it most of the time, which makes their reviews nonesense most of the time.

From just playing what I have in the demo alone this game could be nothing less than a 8.9, everything else is biased dribble.

 

I hate to even talk to you because you're so biased its unreal. How can you know a game is 8.9 from a demo? They have played the game you havn't. You saying its an 8.9 without playing the game makes YOU bias.

 

You havn't played the frigging game for all you know the boss is a pink fluffy rabbit that shoots carrots at you ...

And there was me thinking that Demo's were supposed to let gamers know what the full game would be like and give them a taster of it.

 

 

^This

@ Seece

Wow! Aint that just the pot calling the ketle....

I have played the game, researched it, pretty much all but played the full game yet so my opinion on it holds much more bearing then anything YOU could say about it.

Demos are a jist of what the game will be like. I have put in about 10hrs into the DEMO. Do you have any idea how outrageously fun it is? No, you couldn't .....you haven't played it. The Demo offers majority of the entire first island to play with as well as about 5 missions to contend with. Those FIVE missions are so different in execution that they alone offer more variety then most sandbox games such as GTA.The pop in was not that noticable at all in the demo(only thing that made me pay attention to it was the fact early reviews pointed them out) this is only further enforced by IGN's reviews which say the pop in is no biggy.

Eurogamer also pokes at the mechanics of the game. I find this the most biased because every other person who has played it praises it on this very fact. The cover system is solid, the aiming is on point, the enemies are challenging and fresh. All this can be seen from the Demo. So yea, I do KNOW this game is of much higher quality then Eurogamer would have us believe.

So run along and talk about something where your opinion has basis you obvious little fanboy.

Exactly what have I said about it though forever? I didn't rate it or call it shit. I didn't even say it was a 7. I said none of you could possibly know until you play the full game, and even then your opinion is going to be biased.

 

See you just see a 360 fan and instantly think "HE'S ATTACKING OMG BRING OUT THE GUNZ"

 

Dear god ...

 

 

Well you tend to give the impression that you think the game is "not good" in some way, the way you defend Eurogamer's yet again obviously flawed review.

Through my interpretation of the game I have seen almost exact parallels of what EG is pegging Infamous. The game is FUN, non stop unadulterated FUN, something so rare these days. Not only is it fun but it immerses me in the being of a SUPERHERO quite like this game(this is just the Demo might I add).

I know this game is top quality just like I know MGS4, Killzone 2, and LBP are top quality and no tainted, biased, attention whore of a site like Eurogamer can tell me different.