Onyxmeth said:
dcIKeeL said:
Well, alot of things weren't illegal until someone pointed them out. And what i think is wrong (and i think should be illegal) is KNOWINGLY leaving bugs in just because you're trying to make a deadline or can take care of it later. Patches should be plan b not the default. I don't think glitchy games are the norm...YET but they are certainly crawling in that direction. Maybe the online problems for gears 2 was a product of the games own success, but they have since patched it up and it still takes massive amounts of time to match you up on any given day. I love gears and this really deters my gaming experience for an otherwise great game to the point i have to pop in another game because ive just spent 2 hrs waiting and only about 40-60 mins actually playing. Fallout 3 is another great game and rpg but it contains nearly 10 game ending/crashing glitches. I really don't think consumers who are paying top dollar for OVERPRICED IPs should have to potentially deal with such issues. |
I applaud you for being so gung ho about software patching, but I find your ideas about policing it rather silly. There's nothing there to police.
|
Lol, if it sounds like i feel very strongly about an issue, it doesn't mean i neccesarily do, although i do sometimes. I use this site and others for practice. I'm on a debate team and am thinking about maybe taking up pre law. It's really good to learn to argue for any side of an argument and wether or not u neccesarily agree with what you argue or even care. ANd i love games!
Killing birds with one stone since 1999! 
