| fooflexible said: Smash Bros.: I know what your thinking, they are making a Smash Bros. sequel. Well thats not my point. My point is that we've only been getting one Smash bros. a generation. What's up with that? There is like a million Mario Party titles. heck there is even more mamouth Zelda titles then Smash Bros. games, and you'd think these are easier to crank out, and last time I checked Smash bros. was the biggest thing the Gamecube ever had, so why has it been what five years? And no for nothing but Smash bros. would have been a killer game on the DS. But Instead Nintendo pushes Jump Superstars, while being a great game, it's also a licensing nightmare, so they simply can't publish it outside Japan, but Smash bros. could be and it would have sold in the millions. They could have retooled the n64 version, added characters, and second screen functions and it would have been huge. |
I'd rather see more than 1 Mario Kart per generation. Or true mario game. Super Mario 1 and 3 for NES (2 does not count it's Doki Doki Panic...look it up), Super Mario World 1, Yoshi's Island for SNES. Since then just 1 per console (64 and Sunshine). And, Super Mario Bros. 3 and Super Mario World were released in 1989 and 1990. Back to back years with what are probably still the 2 best Mario games.
At least with Mario Kart it's a tradition since SNES of having just 1 per console. Oh well.
