salaminizer on 18 May 2009
welcome to 2002!
by the way, even if both are FPS, they are VERY different, and thank god, BF is second to none in its sub-genre (although I think ET:QW fans disagree :P). and unless they come up with a micro-transaction model or release a map editor (for PCs), I don't see a reason to get this one. you can buy 1942, 2 or 2142 for cheap and all of them are very complete, especially with Desert Combat and Project Reality. and if you NEED a console BF, my guess is that Bad Company is a more complete experience (I'm not saying it's the SAME)
and yes, I agree that it even the most shallow BF is better, but you know how auto-aim players are...
the words above were backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
