By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
SaviorX said:
^^^Even though you guys are arguing, the tech you are mentioning being put into these games is interesting. The Wii has 4x the RAM of the GC?

From wikipedia:

Wii - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii#Technical_specifications:

Gamecube - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_GameCube#Technical_specifications:

  • 43 MB total non-unified RAM
  • 24 MB MoSys 1T-SRAM (codenamed "Splash") main system RAM. 324 MHz, 64-bit bus. 2.7 GB/s bandwidth.[8]
  • 3 MB embedded EDRAM within "Flipper"".[9]
    • 10.4 GB/s texture bandwidth (peak). 7.6 GB/s framebuffer bandwidth (peak). ~6.2 ns latency.[8]
  • 16 MB DRAM used as buffer for DVD drive and audio. 81 MHz, 8-bit bus. 81 MB/s bandwidth.[8]

 

 

Fixed that minor error. But it does show that while the Wii is more powerful, it's not simply a matter of increased power.

If you know first hand that there's an error in the specs you should contact wikipedia's people and request that it be fixed.

 

I'm a TV Tropes person. Someone else can do that.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs