| Stefan.De.Machtige said: I was talking about the pure value of its electronical parts, not really about it functionality or its true usefullness to the consumer. Sony clearly had different idea's about that then the majority of the gaming crowd, including me. And i'm not under anyone's spin. I share your point about seemingly unneeded things added to the ps3. Sony should allow a similar choosing of components, like Microsoft. That's far more buyerfriendly and cheaper. As noted in other threads, Sony used Blu-Ray (in the PS3) to win the format war and as a consequence lost the console war. Sony will be forced to a pricecut sooner or later, no matter the loss. Or they would let the PS3 die.
|
Believe it or not, accepting the believe that "Blu-Ray isn't necessary for gaming" is a lot more than most would admit to on this forum.
Your posts are fine. I agree with most of them. I understand that you are right, when it comes to the value of each electrical part. I was simply questioning the necessity of some of those parts, and why they were included.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
