axumblade said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Avarice28 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
It's bullshit that the PS3 was the only place where infamous could've been made. The 3D world of Alan Wake in the preliminary pictures looks ten times better than InFamous. |
Alan wake is not a sandbox game for one and also we have never seen "any" 360 footage of the game as of yet. The other problem with Alan wake is we have also not seen any ingame for the pc version either (just cgi from what the developers have said).
|
The last video footage of Alan Wake was from 2007. Imagine how much work they've done to date. I could care less if Infamous is a sandbox game, because there are plenty of sandbox games to go around on the PS3 and the 360. It is a known fact that Sucker Punch are Sony loyalists, despite being an independant company.
|
Yeah. I thought they were 1st party at one point...I could be wrong about that though. Sucker Punch and Insomniac have the ability to develop for other companys yet they don't. It's sort of like how Bungie have the ability to do the same but don't. It happens all the time though....even the major big named multiplatform 3rd party companies show a bias to certain systems.
|
They were never owned by Sony. They've exclusively worked for Sony since 2000. They will play up the PS3 being the better system because of their loyalities, and as long as Sony pays them, I cannot blame them. It is still bullshit about InFamous not being able to be played on the 360. The games graphics are impressive, but that that impressive.
