By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast on 15 May 2009
Edit Thread
bobacob said:
akuma587 said:

The answer is that both have happened.  Some bacteria DID change into something more complex.  Some bacteria DID NOT.  Simply because not all bacteria have evolved into more complex organisms does not disprove the theory of evolution.  If anything, it is evidence that natural selection works both ways.  If you are adapted to your environment already, you don't need to adapt as much.  If you are not adapted to your environment, you "need" to change more.

Hahaha atleast one man has some sense!!!! this man gets a sticker!!!

Many people falsely think that evolution is like what happens in pokemon, you reach a certain level of experience and then you evolve.

Base changes in DNA are completely randomised, unless by a means such as somatic hypermutation in antibody expressing cells.

Evolution is a randomised gradual process NOT a process that is predetermined NOT a process that is directly governed by will. ONE body changes it reproduces either sexually or asexually, it survives, it spreads, just like that.

Natural selection isnt a process by which things are chosen as the term suggests, it is more about how organisms are more likely to survive under different circumstances.

 

 

 

 No... really?? I never thought of it that way! You opened my eyes man!!