By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
highwaystar101 said:

But if mutations kept occuring then one day it would be a new species.

I agree... but there has yet to be a conclusive proof of this.

The same could be said of fruit flys and tons of other species. The only surprising thing of that article is that it happened so fast with lizards who are fairly complex beings.

Until interbreeding is impossible you can't really call it a knew species anymore as the biological theory of species is the current widely accepted mdoel.

 

Which is another funny as thing though... we aren't even sure what a species is or should be. I

What some call Macroevolution is a long proccess tyo be fair and I'm sure many scientists have been trying their best to observe it and have resulted in positive findings. Perhaps not conclusive enough for some, but very positive. I refer you to the homind skulls I posted on the last page as evidence of this.

Either way it would take a long time to directly monitor such a change, we won't witness a 100% change from one species to another in our lifetime. That's the thing, I'm sure many scientists are 100% certain of macroevolution and are searching, rather successfully, for evidence elsewhere.

 

That said a lot of people opinions on webpages I have visited in research seem to suggest that macro and micro evolution are just buzzwords made up by creationists made up so that when evolution was proved on a small scale they could still try to argue against it.