How many users on these boards actually support "The Theory of Evolution"?

[Slimebeast]

Killergran said:

Slimebeast said:

But yeah, bacteria are the big proof that there's a fundamental difference between micro- and macroevolution.

That macroevolution is unlikely.

You forgot to ask the 'why' question. Why is it unlikely for bacteria to evolve to multicell organisms?

And how on earth do you know this hasn't already happened, unsuccessfully? And if it's unsuccessful, why is that?

How about other single-cell organisms? You didn't mention them. Are there any Eukaryot smallnumbered cell organisms? Why? And if so, are they disqualified as evidence?

I think the question here should be, why is the cellcore so important to multiple cell organisms, and do we have any idea where it came from?

 

 You Sir ask some good questions.

You should still modify them a lil IMO, to a broader sense. To look from a broader perspective than to just narrow yourself into thinking "why is the cellcore so important".

Because that would need proof that says that "inventing" the cellcore is an extremely unlikely event in organisms.
(but I have never ever heard anyone claim that)