By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
irstupid on 14 May 2009
Edit Thread
disolitude said:
Bobbuffalo said:
theRepublic said:
disolitude said:
Bobbuffalo said:
@disolitude - "Wii is a gamecube 1.5 with waggle control scheme..." jesuschrist did you use THE MOST PATHETIC EXCUSE the wii haters use?

Note to self: ignore this troll

Prove me wrong... visuals are pretty similar, online is tacked on in most basic mode if available, sounds is...well still "Whoopie", experience is not the same...but its cause of motion controls/balance board. Take that away and what are you left with...GC ports of resident evil? And nitnendo games that probably could have come out for the gamecube (and some like Zelda did).

Im not here to start a war that Wii = GC X 1.5...im just syaing that nintendo really hasn't done anything different games wise this gen. They have with accessories, so the article saying that first party games sell wii is wrong...

 

theRepublic said:
@disolitude

Hardware is nothing without software. It's games like Wii Sports, Wii Fit, and Mario Kart that are driving the success of the Wii.

 

HAHAHA! Right on! :D

 

I am laughing too because Wii hasn't had a AAA software release for almost a year and it still sells like hotcakes. Software must not matter that much...

 

 

 Or this just shows how broken the review system is.

 

The video game review system is like if you only had 25 year old movie reviewers that loved action movies only.

 

So then what do the romance movies, chick flicks, comedies, children movies ect get when reviewed.  They get shitty reviews.  That is how the video game reviewing is these days.  It is all people who only like gears, halo, uncharted, killzone, gta, gran tourismo, ect. games.   So why should I or the consumer give a fuck what they review sims party, animal crossing, petz or whatever else you want to throw in.  

so sorry if i find any argument referring to AAA, AA, A, metacritic or whatever else you want to throw out as bullshit.  I'm not gonna ask a packer fan what he thinks of the Vikings, so why would I care what these reviewers think, their just biased and half or more probably swayed by advertising costs too.