| The Ghost of RubangB said: All you've proven is that the purchasing decisions of XBox 360 owners are more in line with the gaming tastes of game reviewers than the purchasing decisions of Wii owners. You have proven NOTHING about quality except that you trust the opinions of game reviewers over your own opinions. I dare you to use this method to come up with the percentages for the PS2, XBox, and GameCube. |
This pretty much sums up my thoughts on this thread.
|
Naum said: |
I fully believe some reveiwers are bribed and pretty much consider aggregate review scores as a useless tool for the individual. But do you honestly believe that someone would actually bribe a reviewer to score a game lower than what it should be?
| kowenicki said: @dodece I think we can learn from my thread and now this one... that unless the OP shows the PS3 in a fantastic light then all you get is a shit load of sony fans whining about some little aspect or other... |
You sure seem to have some serious gripe with Sony fans. I've counted only two Sony fans before you had posted, who had pointed out a concern with including a year old port. Hell, one of them even complimented on the quality of the thread (although I strongly disagree). I'm sure you'd agree that year old ports don't sell very well?
If anything, it was mostly Nintendo fans whining... and with good reason, might I add. This thread is ridiculous and is based on an assumption of aggregate reviews accurately measuring quality.
Edit: Whoops. I wouldn't of posted had I realized the thread seemes dead already.
