Phrancheyez on 14 May 2009
| kowenicki said: @solidsnake and phrancheyez that post is exactly the same as the opposite, which you are saying is wrong and unjustified... |
I gave my reasons for thinking it could be true. I wrote out a detailed explanation. And, I didn't even say that it is true, I said I'm 'leaning towards it being true'. The opposite(s) are saying 'it's obviously a fake' without giving any kind of reasoning or explanation as to why.
If you'd like to explain as well as I did why you think they're fake or this isn't true, by all means - the stage is yours. Otherwise, you're simply wrong.
