gameman said:
Vetteman94 said:
gameman said:
twingo said:
gameman said: Well then doesnt this prove that a blue ray is point less because there just gonna have DLC anyways? |
If not a troll job then just lol.
|
you think everything is a jab agaisnt the PS3 is a troll, it isnt. Apple, a very cutting edge tech company, is cutting out optical media all together is their newer laptops. http://www.apple.com/macbookair/specs.html Seeing as how even the PS3 relys so heavily on DLC, it shows that a 100 gig optical media is not only not necesary but going in the completely wrong direction.
|
Also, you were correct when you said that Apple was a cutting edge tech company. So cutting edge that the Blu-Ray Association added them to the Board of Directors, since the helped with the creation of the Blu-ray Disc. And Apple was pretty proud of that as well, so much so that they put it on their website.
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/mar/10blu-ray.html
|
Apple was only there to piss off Microsoft. Steve Jobs has said repeatedly that they will NOT put it in their actual products.
|
Dude just go over to any local bestbuy, blockbuster, future shop and see a blu-ray display, there you will see the reason blu-ray was created, and that my friend is for the movies. HD audio on top of native 1080p at 24fps is just outstanding over HDMi, stop kidding yourself and see the real difference. oh! and last I check apple desktops do support blu-ray drives so your point is pretty much moot.