By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MontanaHatchet on 12 May 2009
Edit Thread
kowenicki said:
MontanaHatchet said:
kowenicki said:
@monatan..

Cherrypicked? I used one variable for god sake!!! - It had to be an exclusive game.

I wasnt cherry picking... as in it has to be exclusive, and released within the last 24 months and it had to be a full price game and it had to have been on sale for over 6 months etc etc. Thats cherry picking.

In what way painful? All you do these days Monatana is appear in threads and criticise. Thats painful to read.

Yeah, but then you just randomly made up genres like it was nobody's business. Did you really put Ratchet as a shooter, or was someone joking when they said that? And like I said before, most of the games you listed weren't actually exclusive to the 360 (many of them have PC versions, Viva Pinata for starters).

And if all I did was criticize threads, than that would be all of my posts. More likely, I don't like people who make threads to prove a point and used a biased way to prove it. Are you saying that PS3 owners don't buy multiplatform games? What's your rationale for making this an exclusives list? Really?

 

Yes I did put ratchett as a shooter and I put Killzone 2 as a platform.... can your brain work out what may have happened there???  jesus christ.

Secondly adding in multiplatforms wont make jack difference as they sell pretty much pro rata for the 2 consoles concerned... 

Plus if the "world" knew the 360 was the shooterbox then developers wouldnt make exclusives that werent shooters.. after all who the hell is going to buy them?

I have no idea what you are inferring by me selecting exclusives... perhaps you can enlighten me?  But I doubt it.

The generalisation is dumb and wrong...

Well if that was a typo, maybe you should be more careful when making threads. And I emphasize that you should at least learn how to spell my name correctly. Jesus tap dancing Christ! It's not "Monatan" or "Monatana", it's Montana! You're making me sound like a Pokemon. But I think you'd be better off just trying to spell other words because I don't even know what you're saying in your second line.

I don't really care whose right and whose wrong. I actually agree with you in that neither the PS3 or the 360 are shooter boxes, and that most of the stereotypes are pretty dumb. But by acknowledging the people who say this, and making a thread whining about it, you're just stooping to their level. You're no better than them. And if you want me to enlighten you, I can (I think you need it). Picking a list of exclusives isn't a good idea because most of the exclusives are first or second party, and these companies make games to push hardware rather than sell well and make money (at least, most of the time). And as I showed before, the sales levels of some exclusives aren't representative of the userbase. Since you obviously need things repeated for you twice, I'll say it again. Too Human sold poorly and was considered a flop by many people, but that's in the 360's top 20 selling exclusives. Make any sense? No. The game didn't fit the interests of the 360 userbase, but it's still included in the list with games like Halo 3 and Gears. Hrmm...