Who'd buy a Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire remake on the DS's successor?

[zexen_lowe]

SmokedHostage said:

zexen_lowe said:

SmokedHostage said:

zexen_lowe said:

SmokedHostage said:

zexen_lowe said:
Not me. I think the roster of Pokemon in those games is barely decent, not worth to play it again for me

 

 Are you willing to say that every Pokemon Treecko-Deoxys are "barely decent"

No. I think some are great (like Ralts/Kirlia/Gardevoir). Some are bad (like Whismur/Loudred/Exploud). In average, it's barely decent. What's so hard to understand about it

 

You act like the first 251 are ALL likeable.  There are always going to be Pokemon people like and Pokemon people hate.  Shouldn't suddenly make you want to play the game less.

 

Not the 251 for sure, but a great percentage (like 80-90%) for sure. Yes, there are bad Pokemon like Dunsparce, but in all most pokemon are great and some are down right amazing like Quilava, Charmeleon, Kadabra, Haunter and so on

 

Dunsparce is useless but it's adorable.  How dare you!  Quilava, Charmeleon and Kadabra aren't even that great either..  Haunter is badass though.

 

How dare you with Quilava, Charmeleon and Kadabra, then. Haunter is totally awesome, I beat all of Agatha's pokemons in Blue with a lv.37 Haunter. I've loved it as one of my favourites since then