Squilliam on 07 May 2009
| Unreasonable said: I have a question on this. Given Ballmer recently derided Oracle for buying SUN, stating that MS isn't going to muddy the waters getting into hardware (ignoring the fact that strictly speaking the 360 and Zune, etc are hardware unless I'm missing something), does this post imply that, strictly speaking, MS would prefer not to be responsible for the hardware, but wants to own the software, OS, etc. for home consoles, etc? In other words, if Sony and Nintendo said, hey MS, why don't you provide the GUI, OS, etc. and we'll use DirectX and other MS standards will you let us provide the consoles would MS prefer that? I'm not asking out of preference, but many posters seem to be stating that MS reason's for entering was not so much for the HW as the SW aspects and that implies that MS might well prefer a monopoly on OS, etc for consoles rather than supplying the consoles themselves. |
Microsoft already offered Sony the software platform of Live + Windows IIRC, Ken turned them down. Which kind looks silly now that Sony is staring massive losses in their SCE business in the face. But I think in general they would let any other console maker use their standards really. It protects their Windows business which is more important to them.
Also I heard rumours that Intel offered to build and design the hardware for the next Xbox so long as it included the Larabee GPU. So maybe that indicates something, maybe not. Oh and I think Toshiba makes the Zune, not Microsoft. Its just a rebrand really.
Tease.
