By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Mirson said:

Misleading title and article. It's obviously been written by a Sony fanboy. Just look at the article, "No exclusives to talk of this year Microsoft?" This pamphlet speaks the truth. Why buy a PS3 over a 360 when the 360 has the edge in multiplats.

Pricing - I can buy BioShock at a cheaper price for the 360, and the 360 one has no install and looks better. One or two new characters doesn't justify paying for full price when you can essentially buy the same game on the 360 at a cheaper price (looking at ToV).

Let's not forget all 360 games have achievements, and some have better framerate, resolution, exclusive DLC and no mandatory installs.

And to top it off, there's a kawaii character on the cover to grasp the Japanese gamers' interest. Microsoft is such a brilliant company.

I'd rather a company deliver quality exclusives than have the just have the "edge" in multiplats (which is actually no longer the case). You can spin whatever you want, but the PS3 does fine in multiplats and has plenty of exclusives out and on the way to satisfy a fan looking for a new Playstation. Only problem PS3 has that's MAJOR, is it's price. You're multiplat talk is just YOUR personal bias judging by your post history.

 

 

This^

And Bioshock doesnt even look better on either system, but the PS3 version came with some sort of bonus content. And any tiny graphical difference shouldn't be enough to sway someone's vote either way.

You say pricing on games is an edge? So because PS3 games are built to last with them virtually unphasable, unscratchable, practically invincible that it is inferior? THATS why PS3 games stay at a higher price point. It is because the bluray discs ALWAYS look brand new, no scratchs, or fear of the game not working do to damage.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)