By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hus said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

 

 

 

The game does look good artistically, but that proves the talents of the developers, not the power of a system.

Does not matter how they do it as long as it looks good.

at the end of the day PS2 games look no worse then the competition, thats what matters.

many were the graphics bar for the gen.


You still don't get the point of the phrase "graphics don't matter". It doesn't not mean the subjective artistic quality of the graphics doesn't matter. It means having the greatest objective processing quantity doesn't matter. That's why it's not a dream. The PS2 pushed less than the GC and Xbox, yet won, so having lesser graphics didn't matter.

A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs