By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Grooski on 01 May 2009
Edit Thread
Bitmap Frogs said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:

Referring to mere currency differences isn't the same as referring to the change in exchange rate over time, which is what you needed to mention.  You failed to communicate correctly; you referred to a comparison that had no bearing on the discussion, and thus you were wrong.  You got it on about your third attempt, though.

I'm glad you think things other than strong PS3 sales indicate that PS3 will have strong support going forward; sales also contribute, and I say you're wrong to deny that.  If PS3 games weren't selling as well, Ubi would feel more free to go exclusive with more games.  Thus, this sales report is good for PS3.  Oh noes!  Bitmap Frogs says that's propaganda!!

I referred to moneyhatting as an exception to my statement that Ubi releases would probably be multiplat b/c the PS3 versions were selling well.  If Ubi receives money/extra incentive, then of course an exclusive is more likely.  It's perfectly true and it's common sense. 

It's good that you brought that up again in this last post, along with your annoyances about my username and avatar again.  Hell yeah, I picked those when I went from lurker to poster, prompted by everything starcraft was saying on these message boards.  I was pissed at his FUD, which back then was way worse than it is now. 

Anyway, anyone reading our exchange would see that you abandon multiple lines of the argument each exchange, pick one to maintain, then I argue on that point, maybe to have you abandon parts of that as well.  What if we went back and dredged up all the points you've abandoned?

Good showing, man.

 

Be careful, only scilons make these kind of judgements.

I messed with you and had some fun at the expense of your ignorance. Accept it and maybe from now on you'll bother learning before talking.

It's interesting you are trying the same gimmick I just pulled on you back at me. Come on, can't even figure out a proper trap on your own? Work on those trolling skills, so far you are pretty low-ranked, even though you put a lot of effort into it.

So let me get this straight, you basically picked your username and avatar to troll the boards? That's nice of you to come clean like that. It's also interesting that you show so much affection towards your console that you picked your whole forum identity around it. 100% agenda driven posting. Again, it's very courageous of you to admit to such facts.

While there was a lot of /effort in that post, it still neglects the core of the issue (something you apparently hold dearly): you misinterpreted financial data due to your lack of knowledge on these matters in order to spew some pro-Sony spin. You didn't care about what the issue was, you only cared that you could twist it into nice Sony PR. This behaviour, of course, matches your self-confessed agenda-driven forum identity and posting.

As long as you only care about promoting your agenda, you'll make crappy posts. And crappy posts are an easy hit.


OK Bitmap you are really sounding like a fucking tool and you need to take a deep breath. This news is in fact very positive for Sony. The figures show adjusted revenues including 2 regions in which MS has an install base advantage. We also know that MS has a larger sell through in software in both regions. From this there would be a belief that multiplat support would decrease for the PS3. But, the figures actually reveal the opposite and that revenues per unit sold are higher on Sony's console. This financial position means exclusivity for games in 2010 may be negligible which is the best news for gamers everywhere. And precisely the point Box was making. Calm the fuck down and enough with the personal attacks.