Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
The rest of what you posted was crap, often infused with personal attack. Anyway: 1. No, initially to argue against what I saw as trolling and FUD. How wrong is that, given that everyone can see from this exchange that I do stick to the substance of the discussion and don't add vitriolic comments like you do, except maybe when you can manage to draw out one or two by continued belittlement. But you get a free pass b/c of a difference in username and avatar, huh? lol. 2. No, I didn't misinterpret the data. I didn't say that Sony would definitely come out on top in subsequent years or anything. What I said was that it boded well for continued Ubisoft support, and that was true. You just don't like what I said, and that's the source of your objections. As always between me and you: you don't like what I'm saying, so you'll come in with mean pissy comments. But I think here, as before, I've pretty much wiped the floor with you. You didn't write clearly. Fail. You didn't read correctly what I wrote quite clearly. Fail. |
Hey, even more scilon mannerisms there.
You see, when you truly wipe the floor with people it's other posters that take notice and comment on it. I know it, because I've had people congratulating me on some ownings. Given how it's just yourself claiming that, it sounds sad and pathetic. Maybe in your head you are wiping the floor, but just in your head. Sometime down the line, maybe you'll get people to prop you up. But you gotta earn that.
Again, you misinterpreted data in order to come off with some Sony propaganda. If you knew what was at play before I went over your head about it your post either wouldn't have happened or would have happened in a different way.
Oh, I almost forgot. Whenever you attempt to come out on top, you have to be both smarter and more subtle. Rawly stating the other poster fails is unimaginative and obvious which kills the whole deal. It makes you look douche-y which is counterproductive towards the goal.








