| NiKKoM said: Thats quite bad.... for the PS3... So that would mean that for some PS3 multiplat games with their mandatory installs you are putting almost the entire game on the HD to get the same performance as on the 360?? RE5 had 5?? DMC4 had 4.8? Bioshock 5? |
Errr? I've tried the X360 version (not installed) of RE5 and the loadtimes are significantly longer than the PS3 version. Same goes for DMC4 with its improved performance. Have you tried to install games on your 360? If Every single PS3 has a mandatory Hard Drive, why not take advantage of it? I recall Microsoft itself saying that no games developed on the X360 will be allowed to have mandatory installs because not every X360 has a hard drive.
Mandatory installs doesn't mean a system is inferior. My computer tells me that if I want to play Halo 2, I have to install it on my HDD first. Does this mean that the XBOX is MORE powerful than my gaming rig?
Your logic fails lamentably.
I am a Gamer... I play games and not consoles. I have a PC and Console on which I game... I like games. End of Story!
