TruckOSaurus said:
If that's the case, they should have mentionned it because going from worldwide sales for consoles to American sales for the DS makes things confusing.
|
Indeed but as i said that is just my guess, they could simply of just typed ina wrong number. When working with numbers in reports like that you have to expect input mistakes, all of which get changed. Happen's here too.
People need to read the first few pages of the report to understand how/why the values are what they are. In regards to the xbox/PS2 remark i think it is down to the future revenue of the companies. If you read the first few pages they say
"The brand value published is based on the intrinsic value of the brand — derived from its ability to generate demand. The dollar value of each brand in the ranking is the sum of all future earnings that brand is forecast to generate, discounted to a present day value
Given the high volatility of financial markets over the past 12 months, the brand value is in some cases high relative to current market capitalization, reflecting true value rather than current market swings" So i think what they are trying to say is that all Microsoft products generate more demand then Sony products do. So they try and trickle that down into all sections of companies. Again that would be just my guess. Would have to email them and find out what they mean as its very confusing!









